Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Fenix LR35R size comparison
The Fenix LR35R is 52 mm (2.05 in) longer than the Acebeam E10 2.0, and 11.5 mm wider at its widest point.
The Fenix LR35R is 52 mm (2.05 in) longer than the Acebeam E10 2.0, and 11.5 mm wider at its widest point.
Dimensions
| Acebeam E10 2.0 Check price ↗ | Fenix LR35R Check price ↗ | |
| Length | 88 mm (3.46 in) | 140 mm (5.51 in)+52 mm |
| Head / width | 40 mm (1.57 in) | 51.5 mm (2.03 in)+11.5 mm |
| Body | 25 mm (0.98 in) | 46.5 mm (1.83 in)+21.5 mm |
| Weight | — | 239 g without battery |
| Battery | 16340 | 21700 |
| Max output | 1,200 lm | 10,000 lm |
| Throw | 715 m | 500 m |
| Type | Thrower / search | Thrower / search |
| Price | $49.95 at batteryjunction.com, as of Nov 4, 2026 | $199.95 at fenixlighting.com, as of Nov 4, 2026 |
| Source | batteryjunction.com sourced | fenixlighting.com sourced Listed head 51.5 mm, height 46.5 mm |
We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Rankings are never paid for. Disclosure
E10 2.0 vs LR35R: how they differ
Size and weight
The Acebeam E10 2.0 is the shorter light: 88 mm (3.46 in) against 140 mm (5.51 in), a difference of 52 mm (37%). At its widest point the Acebeam E10 2.0 is 11.5 mm slimmer (40 vs 51.5 mm).
Brightness and throw
The Fenix LR35R is rated brighter: 10,000 lm maximum vs 1,200 lm for the Acebeam E10 2.0, 733% more. For beam distance the Acebeam E10 2.0 reaches further: 715 m vs 500 m rated throw (43% more).
Battery
The Acebeam E10 2.0 runs on a removable 16340 battery; the Fenix LR35R runs on a removable 21700 battery. For scale, a 16340 cell is about 16 × 34 mm and a 21700 about 21 × 70 mm (nominal).
Price
When we checked on Nov 4, 2026, the Acebeam E10 2.0 was $49.95 at batteryjunction.com and the Fenix LR35R $199.95 at fenixlighting.com, so the Acebeam E10 2.0 cost $150.00 less. Prices change often, so check the current price before you buy.
Type
Both are throwers / search lights in our catalog with a tube body.
Which should you buy?
Choose the Acebeam E10 2.0 if you want a shorter light (52 mm shorter), a slimmer profile (11.5 mm narrower) and longer throw (715 m vs 500 m). Choose the Fenix LR35R if you want more output (10,000 lm vs 1,200 lm). We compare published size, weight, output, throw and battery only, not runtime, interface or build quality.
Check price ↗ Acebeam E10 2.0 Check price ↗ Fenix LR35R
We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Rankings are never paid for. Disclosure
E10 2.0 vs LR35R FAQ
Which is smaller, the Acebeam E10 2.0 or the Fenix LR35R?
The Acebeam E10 2.0 is the shorter light: 88 mm (3.46 in) against 140 mm (5.51 in), a difference of 52 mm (37%). At its widest point the Acebeam E10 2.0 is 11.5 mm slimmer (40 vs 51.5 mm).
Which is brighter, the Acebeam E10 2.0 or the Fenix LR35R?
The Fenix LR35R is rated brighter: 10,000 lm maximum vs 1,200 lm for the Acebeam E10 2.0, 733% more. For beam distance the Acebeam E10 2.0 reaches further: 715 m vs 500 m rated throw (43% more).
Which is cheaper, the Acebeam E10 2.0 or the Fenix LR35R?
When we checked on Nov 4, 2026, the Acebeam E10 2.0 was $49.95 at batteryjunction.com and the Fenix LR35R $199.95 at fenixlighting.com, so the Acebeam E10 2.0 cost $150.00 less. Prices change often, so check the current price before you buy.
Do the Acebeam E10 2.0 and Fenix LR35R use the same battery?
The Acebeam E10 2.0 runs on a removable 16340 battery; the Fenix LR35R runs on a removable 21700 battery. For scale, a 16340 cell is about 16 × 34 mm and a 21700 about 21 × 70 mm (nominal).
Compare Acebeam E10 2.0 with similar lights
Compare Fenix LR35R with similar lights
More
Sources
- Acebeam E10 2.0: specs from manufacturer published specs as listed by batteryjunction.com. Price $49.95 from batteryjunction.com, checked Nov 4, 2026; prices change often.
- Fenix LR35R: specs from Fenix product page (manufacturer). Price $199.95 from fenixlighting.com, checked Nov 4, 2026; prices change often.
Found an error? Email liambuehlerbusiness@gmail.com and we will fix it.