Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti vs Sofirn SC32 size comparison

By · Updated · How we compare and rank

The Sofirn SC32 is 5.2 mm (0.20 in) longer than the Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti, and 6.8 mm wider at its widest point. Weights are published on different bases (without battery vs with battery), so compare them with care.

Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti · 94.8 mmSofirn SC32 · 100 mm

The Sofirn SC32 is 5.2 mm (0.20 in) longer than the Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti, and 6.8 mm wider at its widest point. Weights are published on different bases (without battery vs with battery), so compare them with care.

Dimensions

Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti
Check price ↗
Sofirn SC32
Check price ↗
Length94.8 mm (3.73 in)100 mm (3.94 in)+5.2 mm
Head / width18.2 mm (0.72 in)25 mm (0.98 in)+6.8 mm
Body17.8 mm (0.70 in)—
Weight72 g with battery57 g without battery
BatteryAA / 1450018650
Max output500 lm—
Throw——
TypeEDCEDC
Price$79.90 at killzoneflashlights.com, as of Nov 4, 2026not verified yet
Sourcekillzoneflashlights.com sourcedflashlightgo.com sourced
Only head diameter listed

We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Rankings are never paid for. Disclosure

Pokelit AA Ti vs SC32: how they differ

Size and weight

The Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti is the shorter light: 94.8 mm (3.73 in) against 100 mm (3.94 in), a difference of 5.2 mm (5%). At its widest point the Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti is 6.8 mm slimmer (18.2 vs 25 mm). Weights are published on different bases (Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti: 72 g with battery; Sofirn SC32: 57 g without battery), so they are not directly comparable.

Brightness and throw

The Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti is rated at 500 lm; we have no published maximum for the Sofirn SC32.

Battery

The Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti runs on removable AA / 14500 batteries; the Sofirn SC32 runs on a removable 18650 battery. For scale, a AA cell is about 14.5 × 50.5 mm and a 18650 about 18 × 65 mm (nominal).

Type

Both are EDC lights in our catalog with a tube body.

Which should you buy?

Choose the Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti if you want a shorter light (5.2 mm shorter) and a slimmer profile (6.8 mm narrower). On the specs we track, the Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti is ahead or level everywhere; the Sofirn SC32 makes sense mainly if its price, interface or a feature we don't track suits you better. We compare published size, weight, output, throw and battery only, not runtime, interface or build quality.

Check price ↗ Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti Check price ↗ Sofirn SC32

We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Rankings are never paid for. Disclosure

Pokelit AA Ti vs SC32 FAQ

Which is smaller, the Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti or the Sofirn SC32?

The Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti is the shorter light: 94.8 mm (3.73 in) against 100 mm (3.94 in), a difference of 5.2 mm (5%). At its widest point the Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti is 6.8 mm slimmer (18.2 vs 25 mm). Weights are published on different bases (Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti: 72 g with battery; Sofirn SC32: 57 g without battery), so they are not directly comparable.

Do the Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti and Sofirn SC32 use the same battery?

The Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti runs on removable AA / 14500 batteries; the Sofirn SC32 runs on a removable 18650 battery. For scale, a AA cell is about 14.5 × 50.5 mm and a 18650 about 18 × 65 mm (nominal).

Compare Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti with similar lights

Pokelit AA Ti vs Pokelit AAPokelit AA Ti vs MT1A ProPokelit AA Ti vs Tool AA 3.0Pokelit AA Ti vs MicroStream USBPokelit AA Ti vs i3T EOSPokelit AA Ti vs Archer Mini

Compare Sofirn SC32 with similar lights

SC32 vs SC18SC32 vs T1 ProSC32 vs M200 V4SC32 vs Wedge XTSC32 vs FW3ASC32 vs D4K

More

Acebeam Pokelit AA Ti size & specsSofirn SC32 size & specsBest AA flashlightsAll Acebeam lightsAll Sofirn lightsBest EDC flashlights

Sources

Found an error? Email liambuehlerbusiness@gmail.com and we will fix it.