Fenix C7 V2.0 vs Olight Warrior X 3 size comparison
The Olight Warrior X 3 is 0.6 mm (0.02 in) shorter than the Fenix C7 V2.0, and 1 mm narrower at its widest point. Weights are published on different bases (listed vs with battery), so compare them with care.
The Olight Warrior X 3 is 0.6 mm (0.02 in) shorter than the Fenix C7 V2.0, and 1 mm narrower at its widest point. Weights are published on different bases (listed vs with battery), so compare them with care.
Dimensions
| Fenix C7 V2.0 Check price ↗ | Olight Warrior X 3 Check price ↗ | |
| Length | 150.6 mm (5.93 in) | 150 mm (5.91 in)−0.6 mm |
| Head / width | 40 mm (1.57 in) | 39 mm (1.54 in)−1 mm |
| Body | 27.5 mm (1.08 in) | 26 mm (1.02 in)−1.5 mm |
| Weight | 256.5 g with battery | 255 g listed |
| Battery | 21700 | 21700 |
| Max output | 3,300 lm | 2,500 lm |
| Throw | 575 m | 560 m |
| Type | Work light | EDC not on olight.com (US) |
| Price | $79.95 at fenixlighting.com, as of Nov 4, 2026 | not verified yet |
| Source | fenixlighting.com sourced | batteryjunction.com sourced |
We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Rankings are never paid for. Disclosure
C7 V2.0 vs Warrior X 3: how they differ
Size and weight
The Olight Warrior X 3 is the shorter light: 150 mm (5.91 in) against 150.6 mm (5.93 in), a difference of 0.6 mm (0%). At its widest point the Olight Warrior X 3 is 1 mm slimmer (39 vs 40 mm). Weights are published on different bases (Fenix C7 V2.0: 256.5 g with battery; Olight Warrior X 3: 255 g listed), so they are not directly comparable.
Brightness and throw
The Fenix C7 V2.0 is rated brighter: 3,300 lm maximum vs 2,500 lm for the Olight Warrior X 3, 32% more. For beam distance the Fenix C7 V2.0 reaches further: 575 m vs 560 m rated throw (3% more).
Battery
Both run on a removable 21700 battery, so spare cells work in either light.
Type
The Fenix C7 V2.0 is listed as work light and the Olight Warrior X 3 as edc, so they suit different jobs.
Which should you buy?
Choose the Fenix C7 V2.0 if you want more output (3,300 lm vs 2,500 lm). On the specs we track, the Fenix C7 V2.0 is ahead or level everywhere; the Olight Warrior X 3 makes sense mainly if its price, interface or a feature we don't track suits you better. We compare published size, weight, output, throw and battery only, not runtime, interface or build quality.
Check price ↗ Fenix C7 V2.0 Check price ↗ Olight Warrior X 3
We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Rankings are never paid for. Disclosure
C7 V2.0 vs Warrior X 3 FAQ
Which is smaller, the Fenix C7 V2.0 or the Olight Warrior X 3?
The Olight Warrior X 3 is the shorter light: 150 mm (5.91 in) against 150.6 mm (5.93 in), a difference of 0.6 mm (0%). At its widest point the Olight Warrior X 3 is 1 mm slimmer (39 vs 40 mm). Weights are published on different bases (Fenix C7 V2.0: 256.5 g with battery; Olight Warrior X 3: 255 g listed), so they are not directly comparable.
Which is brighter, the Fenix C7 V2.0 or the Olight Warrior X 3?
The Fenix C7 V2.0 is rated brighter: 3,300 lm maximum vs 2,500 lm for the Olight Warrior X 3, 32% more. For beam distance the Fenix C7 V2.0 reaches further: 575 m vs 560 m rated throw (3% more).
Do the Fenix C7 V2.0 and Olight Warrior X 3 use the same battery?
Both run on a removable 21700 battery, so spare cells work in either light.
Compare Fenix C7 V2.0 with similar lights
Compare Olight Warrior X 3 with similar lights
More
Sources
- Fenix C7 V2.0: specs from Fenix product page (manufacturer). Drawing: shape measured from manufacturer photo (batteryjunction.com), scaled to the published length and diameter. Price $79.95 from fenixlighting.com, checked Nov 4, 2026; prices change often.
- Olight Warrior X 3: specs from manufacturer published specs as listed by batteryjunction.com. Drawing: outline from published specs. No verified price yet.
Found an error? Email liambuehlerbusiness@gmail.com and we will fix it.